Today we review an Oregon pinot noir that costs $36 a bottle.
Well, well, well, another fussy, prissy review from your Wineguider, where an excellent red wine is nevertheless panned. What the hell is wrong with me? Basically, I love great pinot noir, and I want your experiences with “the good stuff” to be seriously rewarding. Ponzi is rewarding, yes, but I think there are better pinot noirs that you can buy in the $35 price range. The qualities of this panned, not-recommended wine:
- it’s very interesting
- it’s gently spicy
- it’s elegant
- it’s medium-bodied
- it tastes like blackberries, sort of, with some oak
- it’s juicy but also dry, with no excess sugary sweetness, and no excess mouth-puckering tannins
- its only downfall — it has a slightly thin and slightly sharp taste
- and most importantly of all, it’s fun in your mouth. Complex. A quality shared by all truly good pinot noirs.
So clearly, if you buy the 2007 Ponzi pinot noir, you are going to be happy. Yet, I sit here and pan it. But only because of the $36 price tag. So, in my next few reviews, I promise to recommend what I think are even better pinot noirs in this price range. I’ve been checking out Ponzi, on and off, for over 12 years. This 2007 pinot noir is the best that I have ever tasted. And it is:
Not recommended.
Leave a Reply